Researcher ORCID Identifier

0009-0004-6921-6245

Graduation Year

2025

Date of Submission

5-2025

Document Type

Campus Only Senior Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts

Department

Government

Second Department

Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE)

Reader 1

Jon Shields

Terms of Use & License Information

Terms of Use for work posted in Scholarship@Claremont.

Abstract

To avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, we must study how movements with just ends come to use violent means. An illuminating case study is the Black Panther Party for Self Defense, which, despite attempting to carry on the Civil Rights Movement’s struggle, has long been cast into its shadows. Scholars across many disciplines have put forth theories to explain the causes of political violence. This thesis puts those theories to the test through a close study of the Party, examining why the organization chose violence as a strategy and why its members carried it out. Examining historical accounts, ideological statements, and autobiographies, this analysis highlights the limitations of macro, meso, and micro-level theories when used in isolation, suggesting that a comprehensive understanding requires an integrated approach. It also argues that understanding the Panthers requires attention to their historical and cultural context and serious intellectual engagement with their ideology–an aspect often overlooked by scholars.

With these considerations in mind, we can better grasp the full story of the Panthers. They emerged at a time when the Black liberation struggle was shifting toward self-defense, deeply influenced by Black Power’s emphasis on self-determination. Amidst ongoing inequality and injustice, and recognizing a growing desire for more forceful change, the Party's founders believed that nonviolent methods had been exhausted. To protect themselves from an oppressive regime and secure rights for Black Americans, they felt armed resistance was necessary. Both leaders and rank-and-file members were shaped by their personal experiences with poverty, crime, and racism, which, combined with their Panther ideology, led them to take up a confrontational stance towards police. Violent incidents from confrontations in which the Panthers' militant worldview and their increasingly antagonistic relationship with law enforcement escalated into gunfights.

Download

This thesis is restricted to the Claremont Colleges current faculty, students, and staff.

Share

COinS