Researcher ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2599-6139

Graduation Year

2026

Date of Submission

4-2026

Document Type

Open Access Senior Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts

Department

Government

Reader 1

George Thomas

Terms of Use & License Information

Terms of Use for work posted in Scholarship@Claremont.

Abstract

The Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause has guaranteed birthright citizenship to all children born in the United States for hundreds of years. Yet, President Trump’s January 20, 2025, executive order threatens to strip that right from children born to parents unlawfully in the country and temporary visitors. This order, if permitted to stand, would change the definition of US citizenship and render countless children stateless persons without citizenship rights. This paper examines whether birthright citizenship in the US, properly understood, extends to children of unlawful immigrants and temporary visitors. To answer this question, three time periods of change in citizenship rights are analyzed sequentially. First, the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, shown through the English common law, congressional debates, and Supreme Court cases, established the general rule of universal birthright citizenship. Second, subsequent court cases, such as US v. Wong Kim Ark, demonstrate how this general rule should be applied to later circumstances. Third, the competing briefs and oral argument in the current Supreme Court case, Trump v. Barbara, exemplify current arguments about the application of the Citizenship Clause to current immigration concerns.

The analysis finds that every major line of evidence cuts against the executive order. The Fourteenth Amendment constitutionalized a pre-existing common law rule of near-universal birthright citizenship, departing from it only for three narrow, well-defined categories: children of foreign diplomats, children born during hostile military occupation, and children of Native Americans. Unlawful immigrants fit none of these categories: they are subject to U.S. laws, can be sued in U.S. courts, and owe no formal allegiance to a competing sovereign. Therefore, the Citizenship Clause, properly understood, includes children of unlawful immigrants and temporary visitors.

Share

COinS