“Tribal Trenches”: A Qualitative Critique of Consociational Design in Northern Ireland

Authors

Sarah Hollmann, Stetson UniversityFollow

Abstract

How does consociational power sharing impact ethnic divisions in Northern Ireland? Though those in the consociationalist school would claim that the lack of active political violence in Northern Ireland is a powerful argument in favor of consociationalism; I argue that active violence has been replaced by increasing political polarization and ethno-national tensions. Using data gathered from twenty-four semi-structured interviews in Northern Ireland, this project critiques the hypothesis that ethnic divisions lose their salience after the implementation of consociational power-sharing agreements after ethno-nationalist conflict. Despite the growing literature on the long-term effects of consociationalism, scholars have largely focused on quantitative methods, overlooking qualitative approaches. By presenting an ethnographically based critique of consociationalism, I hope to approach this gap in the literature. This research was generously funded by both the Stetson University Research Experience Grant and by the Stetson Honors Program.

DOI

10.5642/urceu.201801.06

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation

Hollmann, Sarah (2018) "“Tribal Trenches”: A Qualitative Critique of Consociational Design in Northern Ireland," Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union: Vol. 2018, Article 6. DOI: 10.5642/urceu.201801.06
Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/urceu/vol2018/iss1/6