Researcher ORCID Identifier

0009-0009-8316-4601

Graduation Year

2025

Date of Submission

4-2025

Document Type

Open Access Senior Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts

Department

Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE)

Second Department

Government

Reader 1

Jon Shields

Terms of Use & License Information

Terms of Use for work posted in Scholarship@Claremont.

Rights Information

© 2025 Henry I Long

Abstract

Across U.S. colleges, speech climates are poor. Self-censorship and discomfort expressing views are common. At the same time, we find wide variation in speech climates across different institutions. This study is the first to identify factors that predict variation in speech climates. Drawing on data from multiple sources, including a survey of 58,807 undergraduates across 257 colleges and universities from the Foundation from Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), this study constructs a first-of-its-kind dataset to test three core theories of self-censorship found in the literature—student-centric theories, faculty-centric theories, and administrator-centric theories. We find moderate evidence to support each theory. Overall, students appear to be the biggest contributors to self-censorship—student progressivism predicts self-censorship and speech discomfort across domains. Faculty play a stronger role in academic settings—faculty progressivism predicts speech discomfort in classroom discussions and on written assignments. The relationship between the prevalence of administrators and self-censorship is more muted across domains. Rates of student and faculty-driven self-censorship vary across institution types—student-driven self-censorship is highest at small, private, and liberal arts colleges, and faculty-driven self-censorship is highest at large, public, and professions-oriented institutions.

Download

Share

COinS