Graduation Year

2026

Date of Submission

4-2027

Document Type

Open Access Senior Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts

Department

Government

Second Department

Economics

Reader 1

Andrew Sinclair

Reader 2

Eric Helland

Terms of Use & License Information

Terms of Use for work posted in Scholarship@Claremont.

Abstract

This thesis examines the 2025 policy changes affecting the National Park Service (NPS) and their implications for the agency’s mission and advocacy coalition. Historically a bipartisan and widely trusted agency, the NPS has evolved from a conservation-focused mandate into a complex institution balancing environmental protection, recreation, scientific research, and cultural interpretation. Recent policy actions represent not only operational disruption but an unprecedented politicization of the Park Service, reflecting a shift toward centralized executive control. These changes have constrained the agency’s ability to fulfill its mission and placed it within broader ideological conflicts over land use, historical interpretation, and federal authority. Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework, this thesis analyzes the interaction between the Park Coalition and the New Right Coalition, as I term them, in initiating these policy changes and resisting them. Drawing on interviews and policy analysis, I find that while staffing and educational changes are significant, land-use decisions — particularly those enabling development — pose the most lasting and difficult-to-reverse effects on the national park system.

Available for download on Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Share

COinS