Document Type
Book Chapter
Program
International and Intercultural Studies (Pitzer)
Publication Date
2009
Keywords
academy, disciplines, social justice, interdisciplinary, dedisciplinarity
Abstract
Discussions of the contested politics of academic fields that have emerged from social movements often emphasize course content while deemphasizing the ways that power circulates through specific sites in the academy. Certainly women's studies, queer studies, and the different ethnic studies fields have struggled to maintain links to the social movements that engendered them. and a concomitant focus on social change. In a more complex fashion, the same is true of postcolonial studies. Similarly, cultural studies may be understood as an academic field emerging from class-based social movements that are affiliated in complex ways with various Marxist analyses whose academic lineage is longer and differently constituted. Within and among these different fields, ongoing debates continue over their ability to remain oriented toward social justice in the face of pressures from the academy to align with knowledge protocols and modes of claiming legitimacy that are measured in terms distant from those of progressive social change.
Rights Information
© 2011 Rowan & Littlefield
Recommended Citation
Parker, Joseph.“Subjugated Knowledges and Dedisciplinarity in Cultural Studies Pedagogy.” In Writing Against the Curriculum: Antidisciplinarity in the Writing and Cultural Studies Classroom. Ed. Ryan Claycomb and Randi Kristensen. Cultural Studies/Pedagogy/Activism. New York: Lexington Books. 35-56.
Included in
Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Higher Education Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons
Comments
Produced with permission of Rowman & Littlefield. All rights reserved. Please contact the publisher for permission to copy, distribute or reprint.