Researcher ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2815-3979

Graduation Year

2021

Date of Submission

5-2021

Document Type

Campus Only Senior Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts

Department

Government

Reader 1

John Pitney

Terms of Use & License Information

Terms of Use for work posted in Scholarship@Claremont.

Abstract

Abstract: This paper provides a detailed comparative analysis of the United States and Canada in terms of which country had a more effective response to the coronavirus pandemic. To address this question, several factors are considered: population distributions and demographic compositions, political leadership, cultural differences, health care systems, and vaccine production. Each of these variables had an impact on infection and death rates in each country.

Canada was better equipped than the United States to respond to the pandemic in 4 out of the 5 categories listed above: 1) Population distributions were in Canada’s favor because American cities are more densely populated, and they were hit first by the pandemic. New York and Seattle were initial hotspots for the coronavirus, and these areas struggled to control infection and death rates in the early stages of the pandemic. Canada had the advantage of being hit afterward and benefitted from the proactive border-closure policy. 2) Prime Minister Justin Trudeau displayed stronger political leadership than President Donald Trump. President Trump frequently downplayed the threat of the coronavirus and he failed to cooperate with safety measures put forward by public health agencies. Moreover, President Trump failed to implement a national testing strategy early on, which is important to identify who is infected and prevent the spread of the disease. On the other hand, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau always acknowledged the severity of the public health crisis and he encouraged citizens to follow public safety guidelines. Additionally, Trudeau made widespread testing a national priority. 3) Canada’s culture emphasizes social responsibility and collective action, which is important when trying to encourage citizens to comply with social distancing guidelines and mask mandates. On the other hand, American culture is much more individualistic, and many Americans have not complied with social distancing guidelines because they believe doing so is an infringement on their liberty. 4) Canada has a universal healthcare model which is both coordinated and equitable; whereas the United States has a more fragmented healthcare system which made implementing a cohesive response to the public health crisis more difficult. Because all Canadians have access to health insurance, citizens were able to seek medical treatment when they were experiencing symptoms of the coronavirus. On the other hand, 1 in 5 non-elderly Americans are uninsured, and so this demographic was more reluctant to seek medical consultation due to their inability to cover out-of-pocket costs and medical expenses.

While the Canadian government responded better to the coronavirus than the American government in 2020, the narrative shifted during 2021. The United States has been much more successful than Canada with vaccine production and distribution. The key driver behind American success in 2021 is that the United States has the largest and most resourceful pharmaceutical industry in the world.

These findings are important because they provide insight regarding what constitutes a strong government response to a pandemic. Pandemics have occurred throughout history and they will continue to emerge in the future. This paper offers key takeaways and lessons about how governments should handle the next public health crisis.

Comments

The Philip Roland Prize for Best Thesis in Public Administration and Public Policy

Download

This thesis is restricted to the Claremont Colleges current faculty, students, and staff.

Share

COinS