Home > LIBRARY > JOURNALS > CURRENT_JOURNALS > CODEE > Vol. 7 (2009-2010)
Publication Date
2-8-2009
Keywords
Computational methods; Numerical methods; Predator prey; Autocatalator; Projectile motion
Abstract
Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are often used to model the behavior of physical phenomena and textbooks today especially demonstrate this fact. Since only a very small collection of ODEs can be solved analytically, there is often no alternative than to use computer software to gain some insight into the behavior of solutions (and sometimes even if solution formulas are available--the formulas are often complicated!). A classic work on the numerical solution of ODEs was authored by (Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations, Chapman and Hall/CRC,1994). There are some questions about the behavior of solutions of ODEs that are not quite appropriate for numerical solvers. In this paper we present examples which illustrate some of these features. However, there is no disputing the fact that the output of numerical solvers is often useful for portraying and understanding the behavior of solutions of ODEs and their utility in modeling physical phenomena, as our final example shows.
Recommended Citation
Borrelli, Robert and Coleman, Courtney
(2010)
"Pitfalls and Pluses in Using Numerical Software to Solve Differential Equations,"
CODEE Journal:
Vol. 7, Article 5.
Available at:
https://scholarship.claremont.edu/codee/vol7/iss1/5
ODEToolkit file for equations 2.12-13