Abstract / Synopsis
This paper takes a mathematical analysis technique derived from the Interrogator’s Fallacy (in a legal context), expands upon it to identify a set of three interrelated probabilistic tools with wide applicability, and demonstrates their ability to assess hypothesis-evidence relationships associated with important problems
DOI
10.5642/jhummath.201602.13
Recommended Citation
Justus R. Riek, "Simple Tools with Nontrivial Implications for Assessment of Hypothesis-Evidence Relationships: The Interrogator’s Fallacy," Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, Volume 6 Issue 2 (July 2016), pages 179-199. DOI: 10.5642/jhummath.201602.13. Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/vol6/iss2/13
